The Art of Zen

Close_up_waterdrop_on_flower_cb_wp8Those who bothered to read “Two Cedars Piercing the Sky” might be scratching your head. Why is Emily Dickinson relevant at all? Well, there is a particular Zen quality to her writing. Master Tam translated three of her poems, “My river runs to thee,” “I died for beauty, but was scarce” and “Because I could not stop for Death.” For those who are fluent in Chinese, they can been seen here:

I translated Tam’s translator note (!) below. Perhaps one can breathe in the Zen air from here. Awkwardness and unneeded flourishes are entirely mine.

*                     *                      *

I am not an avid reader of English poetry; I do not have the intention to translate any into Chinese. At the end of last year, in the midst of clearing my personal library, I found my draft translation of three poems by Emily Dickinson, something I did by happenstance more than a decade ago. Coincidentally, it turns out to be the 90th anniversary of her passing. I take this occasion to edit the translation as my ode to her.

Dickinson died in May 1886. She was 56. She spent most of her life at the family’s homestead in Amherst, and she was never married. It was said that a failed romance at 23 led her on the path of seclusion. Her poetry was not intended for publication; they were put aside upon completion, unlike many of us writers who cannot wait to submit material to the publishers. I certainly believe that she spoke her mind in her poetry. She did not cater to the fashion of the time, and there was not a need to do so. I translated her name into Di Ganxun, it was intended as a little game of words. Ganxun means that all men pale in her presence. And the word Gan, read aloud in Cantonese, is also the correct transliteration.

I chose these poems because I feel that they can showcase her thinking.

The first poem expresses the poet’s desire to be one with nature. Between heaven and earth, if one can indeed meld with nature, this is Zen. In many ways she was quite Zen. However, there was an active pursuit. The intention to strive for an ideal lessens the profundity. This is, of course, said from the Zen perspective. Having such a desire is an admirable quality in a poet, especially for an American in the 19th century.

In the second poem she proclaimed that beauty was the truth. She strived for beauty in her life and she abided by this ideal. In her poems, she never spoke of the turmoil in the conventional world. Being out of touch may be her shortcoming. At the same time, she has transcended the barrier of time. The power of her poetry will not lose its sparkle as time passes. Perhaps what she strived for is a beauty that is pure and simple, the truth that is eternal.

In the third poem we observe her way of facing death. Fearless in death, she treated death as her eternal resting place. She spoke of passing the school, the fields and then the setting sun. They symbolize the footstep one makes in youth, in adulthood, in old age. And finally, the compassionate angel of death brought her to eternity. This eternity is her grave – the house in the fifth stanza is clearly a description of a grave.

To suggest that the three poems completely represent all of her output is akin to the blind men and the elephant story, yet we could consider them as a lens into her life and times. During translation, I had tried to follow the metric pattern, but less the overall structure. Dickinson’s style is ethereal and yet unadorned. My translation might have added awkwardness and unneeded flourish.

(Published in Mingpao Monthly, April 1976.)

Two Cedars piercing the Sky

Male Bullock's Oriole at Atascadero LakeFor fun, a colleague and I translated a poem Master Tam wrote in 1976 (published in Mingpao Monthly in April 1976), in memory of Emily Dickinson for the 90th anniversary of her passing. The left column is his original poem, the right column is our experiment. Enjoy.

Two Cedars piercing the Sky
Like candles, a faint light
At the end of the hallway—
Night falls on
Your altar.
Morning dew on Saha’s tresses
White silk sweeps winding halls
Cutting through early chaos
Bitter first rays
Lonely light.
It is not of the oriole who sings
The tune in the tree.
You say the moon
Follows soft not the sun’s 20,000 footprints.
No reason for epitaph or
To flee from shoe flaps
And heart beats that once stroked
The fields, and roughing
The south winds of May was
The hand that climbed the rainbow.
Say a banished immortal briefly lighted here
And like wind it passed
If the deer girl took lotus steps
This is the land of lotuses
Like clouds we drift from here.

Special Lecture on the Preliminary Practice (Toronto, April 13)

SHEIN_Dancers1On the April 13 (Saturday, 10:30am – 1pm) meditation class, you are invited to a special class on the Preliminary Practice. (It is published in English as “The Dzogchen Innermost Essence Preliminary Practice” also colloquially known as “the core teaching that is vast and pervasive.”) The Preliminary Practice is considered the “common” foundation in many Buddhist traditions. However, a practitioner’s perspective may be a determining factor as to whether it is a set of mechanical motions (“common”) or an expedient breakthrough leading to a wide(r) and compassionate application to all matters in life (“uncommon”). Using the Preliminary Practice as the basis, the discussion will be on the “uncommon” that belies all “common” Buddhist practice. Master Tam, a Nyingma lineage master and the founder of Vajrayana Buddhism Association, will present this class.

All are welcome.

No prior knowledge about the Preliminary Practice is needed. For the inquisitive, see below for a brief introduction. Alternatively, our meditation class is open to the public every Saturday 10:30am-noon.

We are located:

705 Middlefield Road
2nd Floor, Unit B212
Scarborough, ON
M1V 5H5

Or contact us at

*                         *                         *

Excerpted and translated from Tam’s The Guide to the Natural Liberation of the Six Bardo and On the Buddha-Within:

According to Nyingma teaching, all matters of life and death arise naturally upon a primordial ground. That is to say, all perspectives arise upon a primordially pure mind. (The perspective itself can be deemed pure or impure, the mind is unstained nevertheless.) The difference between Buddha and an ordinary person is the awareness of this “natural arising (on primordial ground).” On the other hand, this awareness never ceases, but its arising may become obscured or conceptually twisted, often unnecessarily so. Many Buddhist teachings have expedient methods for re-discovering this awareness, step-by-step leading to natural liberation, or mundanely speaking, being at ease with day-to-day reality.

From “natural arising” to “natural liberation” lies the key to what separates ignorance and awareness. All tantric practices are designed to take advantage of this arising-to-liberation. This is certainly the case in the Preliminary Practice where the practitioner follows a path, first meditating via bodyspeech and mind, then more refined via channelswind, and drop. With intermediary meditative states of blissluminosity, and non-conceptuality, one realizes the Buddhist fruition of DharmakayaSambhogakaya, and Nirmanakaya. This is the path bridging the realm of “natural arising” (the appearance and the function) to the realm of “natural liberation” (the essence). Maitreya wrote in Dharmadharmatavibhaga, that this is the practical way to stop clinging on to worldly matters and become re-integrated with nature and its natural flow.

Consider Śākyamuni as an example. When he became enlightened, his human form was still a living and breathing being in our world. His way of living, including acts of eating and sleeping, was entirely the life of an ordinary person. However, his wisdom state-of-mind is described as “the mind seeing suchness.” Whatever arises upon the consciousness, the arising is seen “as is.” This wisdom is said to be selfless in that the world is not seen through the lens of the self (subject) and that belonging to the self (object), nor is it filtered through conceptual thinking. This “mind” is objective in that it is an honest reflection of the world. This “mind” is not the same “mind” as in the western philosophy of idealism where the mind is considered subjective and all objects are determined by it.

Quoting Padmasambhava, there are observations but no observer. This state-of-mind can be described as “a baby in a golden Buddhist temple.” A golden Buddhist temple is bright and shiny, decorated with many precious things. To a normal person, this temple is recognized through the conceptual lens: this is a statue and it is solemn; this is a lotus altar, therefore it is pure; and there are offerings, thus piety is important. Such observations arise from subjective perspectives/conceptual lens. The appearance of the temple is entirely a subjective appearance. For a baby, “the mind seeing suchness,” the appearance is not twisted or limited by ideas of elegance, purity or piety. What is seen is simply seen.

The Preliminary Practice is established to pave the way for the practitioner to realize that the ordinary world in which we live is akin to the images arising in the mind. And yet, while we are living in our reality, our consciousness can take a step back and reflect honestly. The practice includes paying homage to the root guru, arousing bodhicitta, purification, offering and guru yoga.

Paying homage is a foundation to the practice. By paying homage to the guru, one’s practice follows the guru as one follows a roadmap. Whether one follows Hīnayāna (Small Vehicle) or Mahāyāna (Great Vehicle), paying homage is common across Buddhism.

In arousing bodhicitta, there are two aspects: wisdom and expedience. Wisdom is the state of mind to strive for, while expedience refers to the conventional world—the appearance arisen upon consciousness, which is sometimes called “great compassion” or “great life force.” Without wisdom one has no realization; without life force, nothing arises. So the essence of bodhicitta is labeled as “the non-duality of wisdom and compassion.” Bodhicitta is the practical basis of Mahāyāna, but not Hīnayāna, and thus it is an uncommon foundation.

Purification is about removing various obstructions. Some obstructions accumulate life-after-life while other obstructions are more innate, such as constraints from three-dimensional space and linear time. A being, through the cycle of life and death (saṃsāra), commits acts of body, speech and mind. These actions accumulate over time and become certain tendencies that persist in saṃsāra. Purification establishes a foundation for (natural) liberation, where one realizes one consciousness rests upon a primordially pure and unobstructed mind, which is the nature of Buddha (“Buddha-Within”).

Offering refers to mandala offering. The mandala is where we pay homage. Through physical offerings and visualized offerings, we accumulate conventional merits. Through the practice of offering one also experiences the emptiness of the three wheels (offerer, offeree, offering). By doing so we accumulate wisdom merits. Offering is the practical meditative extension of arousing bodhicitta. The two types of merits help one navigate around difficulties faced in one’s practice.

Last, but not least is guru yoga. The guru is established as the amalgamation of the three jewels (BuddhaSangha, and Dharma). This practice collects the previous practices into one. Yoga means correspondence. Through yoga practice, one’s state-of-mind becomes a “heart-to-heart” with the three jewels. At this stage, one can truly follow the true guru instruction to enlightenment. At this point, confidence becomes a determining factor. Without it, one cannot truly follow the (guru’s) path in one’s practice.